Kortor Kamara asked:
The socialized system of care delivery m doctor and financing, a relic of the colonial era brit? Nica, todav? To practice in Sierra Leone has glaringly failed and any effort to reanimaci? N? L without putting into pr ? ctica of structural reform and sist? mica important to serve? only prolong the inevitable. Throughout the world, state control and overall management of industries, services, markets and means of the production? N is est? No gradually becoming a relic of the past. This model seg? N practiced in the health system of Sierra Leone emp? Rich has been shown to have served only to stifle out of using innovative? No, growth, productivity and quality with a declinaci? N est resulting in ? ndares total m life and care doctor of citizens. The current status of hospitals and health centers glaringly highlights the problems sist? Monkeys end? Monkeys in the government health system, operated, funded and managed entirely. The operation? No continuing a system so decadent and dilapidated delivery and financing, lacking in even the basics of a modern infrastructure m care doctor quota? To relegating Sierra Leone to the very bottom of? Human development index . The TRANSFORMING? N as? the system? m doctor delivery and financing of care m doctor in private insurance or national insurance bas? opportunities the system offers no s? it for insurers to develop plans and market-based pol? insurance ticas m doctor as well? n & serves to make the Ministry of Health, El? s of? of Sanitation? dese? pol goals? tica, as espoused in 2002 pol? national pol tica? tica Paper.Both health and regulatory officials, healthcare providers, the insurance industry and other stakeholders should be engaged to carry out the start pr? ctica sist reforms? micas essential if the pa? s is to avoid a cat? Strofada even greater. Privatization: n:? Under? the proposed plan of the Privatization? n, & the Ministry of Health and Sanitation to be? changed ownership and management of hospitals, cl? Nicas, and patr? n del? last resort for all m? dicos, nurses and ancillary health care providers in a health agency with only the pol? tica and regulatory functions. The goal be? for the health agency to serve as a pol? tica and watchdog? No regulator mandated to ensure that assistance m? dica adequate and quality est? provided in several hospitals, cl? niques and private pharmacies to be? n with the inevitable set desintegraci? No existing government facilities. With desintegraci? Ny purchase or subsequent leases of these hospitals, cl? Nicas, health centers and other facilities, investors and entrepreneurs in an effort to make The investment return? Nm? Xima be? bound econ? Composite to increase quality and est? ndar care to introduce the advanced equipment and tecnolog? as and to engender a kind of competició? n the market forces that inure solely to the improvement of consumers pa health? s. A teas? N much needed capital in the care industry m doctor by that the privatization plan? No stimulating? activities clearly econ? additional lenses in ancillary industries such as the diplomatic din? micas the Privatization? ny forces of the market mechanism of supply and demand secure? n competició? n to m pie care doctor. Divestment of government property: The dismantling of the delivery of care m doctor huge and highly inefficient government and the current financial institution is a perspective of order p? Blico dise? Ar divestiture and restructuring to ensure government ownership and management of hospitals and other care facilities m doctor. Under such a scenario the huge cost of setting? s of? the government? but unfortunately current improperly managed services m? dicos be? n inefficiencies decreased substantially as the corrupci? No, salaries of providers, infrastructure maintenance, costs of medications and equipment diagn? stico and other expenses of holdings: No up to be? n no m? s recurrent expenditure? s of? the nation? depleting boxes. A study based on the entire system in a national plan based on the private insurance market m doctor with private enterprise and competition in the market as a base path appears m? Sl? Gica of the pol? Tice of reform future infrastructure to ensure sound, efficient and effective care m doctor. Insurance Plans m doctor of?: The tooth that the proposed new system should revolve around a national network of affordable insurance plans m doctor creative design? Ados to ensure greater participaci? No one pool more? to the poblaci? n. In such insurance m doctor system established? Na the compa?? Ace and provider organizations to put several health plans with services m? Acronyms and awards based on market conditions. The responsibility for monitoring compliance by the various plans down? To below under the Ministry of Health and Sanitation and the insurance system Comisi? N of Sierra Leone: A table? No Privatization important in this? No proposal for the delivery and financing m care doctor hinges on the promulgaci? n of the Legislation? No insurance m doctor that provides for employers to provide care doctor to their employees and dependents as part of a benefits package est? ndar concomitant tax incentives and government subsidies to insure compliance. With such legislació? No socialized freely virtual system of care m? Dica, whose costs have been driven exclusively by the government now be? based on a multi-payer system in which government, employers and employees all participate. With the system as currently structured, however, only the government has an interest? S financial and stake and when other programs est? No conflict with the care financing m doctor, the pol? Ticos has been only too willing to sacrifice health of their citizens on that? l alter of their greed and personal enlargement. It is believed that insurance providers m doctor put? No concepts and plans, such as health maintenance organizations (HMOs) and preferred provider organizations (PPOs), a trav? S alliances of health providers and com? as insurance and because the employers, unions, government ministries and corporations on a higher base year. The competició? N engendered by such health organizations pie safe m doctor give? subsequently lead to tariffs, the coverage, deductibles, co-payments to competitive and prizes for care costs m doctor affordable for all. The unemployed: As the unemployment and underemployment are perennial problems in the Sierra econom? To the Lions, the provisions? N care benefits m doctor to this categorical? To the poblaci? N must remain the responsibility of government . Services m? Dicos provided to this categorical? To citizens in a private company should be reimbursed by the government on a negotiated fee schedule and default or an insurance mechanism established qu? government negotiates with suppliers and carriers to the provisions? No services. As an example a fund established by imposing gravel in the private health care providers are considered to emerge with such Privatization? No, it will be? To establish and use to pay for them destitute. Adem? S from hospitals, cl? Nicas m? Dicas and other facilities m? Dicas be? N functions such as business, or for profit or nonprofit organizations, the market forces of supply and demand secure? No surely that quality patient care, improvements in tecnolog? ace diagn? stico, qualified and a general sensitivity to customer demands drive? n the new market. Let? Rgica and ineffective as m? S hospitals witnessed the atm? Sfera government to care services? No customer be virtually nonexistent? An philosophy today? To the past. The feasibility econ? Mica care of business m doctor dependent? in much of the clientele that can attract and keep using the criterion above. The plans and providers of services wrong? M Simos care doctor drop? N inevitable business to competitors because the participants of each a? Or will have? N opportunity to change insurance plans m doctor. Since a poblaci? N large of Sierra Leone live in rural areas, the proposed plan of the Privatization? No insure? the extensi? n m care facilities doctor in? reas currently maintained inadequate. This plan is insured? that the cl? niques and the doctors put the store in every part of pa? s to tap into care m doctor services available in these rural areas. Challenge? You to compa?? As insurance: Dise?'m A system and an insurance plan to cater to the needs of the poblaci? N which are often rural independent agr gang? Tails and mining of the activities a DESAF ? or insurers in Sierra Leone, which in the past have been largely passive and unimaginative in design? or pol? tica DESAF solve? you and the risks they faced the socio landscape? monkey's? s of? the nation?. The din subscribe? Economic and creative risks should be undertaken by the subscribers, actuaries and market the specialists? N dise? Ar, adapt and assess insurance coverage doctor to meet the diverse needs of p? Lic insurance. For example, creation? No CATEGORIZED pool? As professional Request: Can you be a m? Everything which encourages? s of? the insured?, dedicated to similar businesses can be? to form cooperatives for OBTAINING order? No insurance coverage m doctor at affordable rates for s? themselves and dependents. The higher payments to the reunion together No material of cooperatives can be an m? All alternative payment for services m? Dicos. The compa?? As insurance m doctor Podr? An possibly establish the compa? Only as subsidiary or ancillary to the direction? No payments made by cash crops. The current system under which the government uses nearly all doctors and related healthcare providers while at the same time private practices have to be? Changed with an attendant savings in government salaries, productivity and other fringe benefits. For the Privatization? N assumes control in hospitals, the m? Dicos, nurses and other providers be? N not m: s in the n? Pay mine? s of? the government? but be? n some independent contractors with their own pr? cticas. Conclusion: No: As a versi? No micro reform proposal has proliferated r? Pidamente of an ad hoc fashion during a? You with some great COM
